Complaint #201402587, March 2014

Incident: March 13, 2014
Received: March 18, 2014
Closed: March 30, 2015

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 77th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Officer:	Valderrama, Alejandro
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valderrama, Alejandro
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valderrama, Alejandro
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Clark, Pagiel
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Clark, Pagiel
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Clark, Pagiel
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Valderrama, Alejandro
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Clark, Pagiel
Complainant:	Black Male, 21
Allegation:	Force: Chokehold
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Valderrama, Alejandro	Black Male, 21	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Valderrama, Alejandro	Black Male, 21	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unsubstantiated
Valderrama, Alejandro	Black Male, 21	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Unsubstantiated
Clark, Pagiel	Black Male, 21	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Unsubstantiated
Clark, Pagiel	Black Male, 21	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment	Unsubstantiated
Clark, Pagiel	Black Male, 21	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Valderrama, Alejandro	Black Male, 21	Offensive Language: Other	Unsubstantiated
Clark, Pagiel	Black Male, 21	Force: Chokehold	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.