Complaint #201410262, October 2014

Incident: October 2, 2014
Received: October 6, 2014
Closed: January 30, 2015


Document: APU Quarterly Report summary (Alan Rosenthal)

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Park
In NYPD 88th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Alvaro Menjivar
Officer: Rosenthal, Alan
Complainant: Black Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Rosenthal, Alan
Complainant: Black Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Jamison, Justin
Complainant: Black Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Jamison, Justin
Complainant: Black Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Oneill, Kellan
Complainant: Black Male, 48
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Rosenthal, Alan Black Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Other Unsubstantiated
Rosenthal, Alan Black Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Charges)
Jamison, Justin Black Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Charges)
Jamison, Justin Black Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Charges)
Oneill, Kellan Black Male, 48 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Charges)

Penalties

Rosenthal, Alan
Reprimand
Closed: Plea set aside, Instructions, February 2017
APU Instructions
Instructions

Jamison, Justin
Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2017
APU Guilty
Forfeit vacation 2 days

Oneill, Kellan
Closed: Guilty after trial, April 2017
APU Guilty
Reprimand


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.