Complaint #201502100, March 2015

Incident: March 11, 2015
Received: March 20, 2015
Closed: October 7, 2015

Reason for contact: Other violation of VTL
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 103rd Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: George Katris, Philip Marks, Eric Moy, Ducarmel Pierre, Dimitrios Roidis

Officer:	Sinatra, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Sinatra, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ludemann, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ludemann, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 45-49
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Sinatra, Mark
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Ludemann, Daniel
Complainant:	Black Male, 49
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Sinatra, Mark	Black Male, 49	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Sinatra, Mark	Black Male, 49	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Ludemann, Daniel	Black Male, 49	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop	Exonerated
Ludemann, Daniel	Black Male, 49	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 45-49	Discourtesy: Word	Officer(s) Unidentified
Sinatra, Mark	Black Male, 49	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated
Ludemann, Daniel	Black Male, 49	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.