Complaint #201506397, August 2015

Incident: August 1, 2015
Received: August 3, 2015
Closed: November 23, 2015

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Capo, Jesus
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Capo, Jesus
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer:	Pennacchia, Johnpaul
Complainant:	Black Male, 30
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Capo, Jesus
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer:	Capo, Jesus
Complainant:	Black Female, 38
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Capo, Jesus	Black Male, 15	Abuse of Authority: Question	Exonerated
Capo, Jesus	Black Male, 15	Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Pennacchia, Johnpaul	Black Male, 30	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Capo, Jesus	Black Male, 15	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Capo, Jesus	Black Female, 38	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Capo, Jesus

Penalty: Formalized Training

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.