Complaint #201507960, September 2015

Incident: September 19, 2015
Received: September 21, 2015
Closed: February 12, 2016


Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Apartment/house
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Genaro Barreiro, Besim Pelinku, Jose Tabora
Officer: Dicecco, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Dicecco, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Kearney, Daniel
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dicecco, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 46
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dicecco, Michael
Complainant: Male
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dicecco, Michael
Complainant: Female
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Dicecco, Michael White Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Dicecco, Michael White Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Kearney, Daniel White Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Unsubstantiated
Dicecco, Michael White Male, 46 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated
Dicecco, Michael Male Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated
Dicecco, Michael Female Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Dicecco, Michael
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.