Complaint #201602548, March 2016
Incident: March 17, 2016
Received: March 26, 2016
Closed: July 26, 2016
Document:
Complaint Closing Report
Reason for contact: Other
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD
71st Precinct
Brooklyn
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct
Officer:
Savella, David
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Savella, David
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:
Exonerated
Officer:
Machado, Luis
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Machado, Luis
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Savella, David
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Savella, David
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Machado, Luis
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Machado, Luis
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Unfounded
Officer:
Rodriguez, Miguel
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Rodriguez, Miguel
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:
Unsubstantiated
Officer:
Lluka, Lazo
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Rodriguez, Miguel
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:
Savella, David
Complainant:
Black Male, 27
Allegation:
Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:
Substantiated (Charges)
Savella, David
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Substantiated (Charges)
Savella, David
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Exonerated
Machado, Luis
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Machado, Luis
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
Substantiated (Charges)
Savella, David
Black Male, 27
Force: Physical force
Substantiated (Charges)
Savella, David
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Substantiated (Charges)
Machado, Luis
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Substantiated (Charges)
Machado, Luis
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Unfounded
Rodriguez, Miguel
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Substantiated (Charges)
Rodriguez, Miguel
Black Male, 27
Discourtesy: Word
Unsubstantiated
Lluka, Lazo
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Rodriguez, Miguel
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Savella, David
Black Male, 27
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Substantiated (Charges)
Penalties
Machado, Luis
APU Case Status:
Closed: Retained, with discipline, July 2018
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
Penalty:
Dismissal Probation 365 days
Rodriguez, Miguel
APU Case Status:
Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline, April 2016
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline
Lluka, Lazo
APU Case Status:
Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline, April 2016
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline
Penalty:
Forfeit vacation 10 days
Savella, David
APU Case Status:
Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline, April 2016
NYPD Conclusion:
APU Closed: Previously adjudicated, with discipline
Penalty:
Command Discipline B
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.