Complaint #201605973, July 2016

Incident: July 9, 2016
Closed: February 22, 2017


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 32nd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Giorlys Alvarez, Rosario Gatongarcia, Zachariya Syed, Mark Velasco
Officer: Soriano, Eddy
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Badia, Elvis
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Gill, Jeffrey
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer: Soriano, Eddy
Complainant: Black Male, 27
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Soriano, Eddy Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Badia, Elvis Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Gill, Jeffrey Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Soriano, Eddy Black Male, 27 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Black Female, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Officer(s) Unidentified

Penalties

Badia, Elvis
Formalized Training

Soriano, Eddy
Formalized Training

Gill, Jeffrey
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.