Complaint #201606965, August 2016

Incident: August 10, 2016
Received: August 14, 2016
Closed: February 6, 2017


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 45th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Garcia, Albert
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Garcia, Albert
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Melendez, Yilson
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Quis, John
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Melendez, Yilson
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Melendez, Yilson
Complainant: White Male, 45
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Garcia, Albert White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Unsubstantiated
Garcia, Albert White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Melendez, Yilson White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Quis, John White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Melendez, Yilson White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Melendez, Yilson White Male, 45 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Quis, John
Formalized Training

Garcia, Albert
Formalized Training

Melendez, Yilson
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.