Complaint #201607668, August 2016

Incident: August 30, 2016
Received: September 7, 2016
Closed: May 15, 2017


Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Prophenson Meristil, Andrew Pagano
Officer: Dwyer, Ryan
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Dwyer, Ryan
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Unknown Officer
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer: Lacalamita, Daniel
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Lacalamita, Daniel
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Crerend, Daniel
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Hernandez, Nelson
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Dwyer, Ryan Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Dwyer, Ryan Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Officer(s) Unidentified
Lacalamita, Daniel Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Lacalamita, Daniel Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Crerend, Daniel Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated
Hernandez, Nelson Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.