Complaint #201701414, December 2016

Incident: December 15, 2016
Received: February 21, 2017
Closed: July 11, 2017


Reason for contact: Other
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 42nd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Witness Officers: Emil Alvarez, Antonio Desucre, Bryan Gomez, Michael Holland, Luis Rodriguez, Preston Uwoghiren
Officer: Riveragonzalez, Joel
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Riveragonzalez, Joel
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Riveragonzalez, Joel
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Riveragonzalez, Joel
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gonzalez, Adam
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Riveragonzalez, Joel
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 21
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Riveragonzalez, Joel Hispanic Female, 21 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unsubstantiated
Riveragonzalez, Joel Hispanic Female, 21 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Riveragonzalez, Joel Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Unsubstantiated
Riveragonzalez, Joel Hispanic Female, 21 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Gonzalez, Adam Hispanic Female, 21 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Riveragonzalez, Joel Hispanic Female, 21 Abuse of Authority: Other Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)

Penalty

Riveragonzalez, Joel
Formalized Training


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.