Complaint #201703477, May 2017

Incident: May 3, 2017
Received: May 4, 2017
Closed: September 22, 2017


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 88th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued
Officer: Gordon, David
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Light, Richard
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Light, Richard
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Light, Richard
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer: Gordon, David
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Gordon, David
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 26
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Gordon, David Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Light, Richard Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Light, Richard Hispanic Male, 26 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Light, Richard Hispanic Male, 26 Discourtesy: Action Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Gordon, David Hispanic Male, 26 Discourtesy: Action Unsubstantiated
Gordon, David Hispanic Male, 26 Abuse of Authority: Retaliatory summons Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)

Penalties

Light, Richard
Instructions

Gordon, David
Command Discipline - A


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.