Complaint #201705257, June 2017

Incident: June 21, 2017
Received: June 27, 2017
Closed: December 8, 2017

Reason for contact: Traffic accident
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 110th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Yavier Julio, Robert Matzelle, Albert Yannucciello, Daniel Ziegler

Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Force: Hit against inanimate object
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Force: Handcuffs too tight
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Johnson, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Rosenberg, Michael
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Smith, Gregory
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Smith, Gregory
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 32
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 30-34
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 30-34	Force: Hit against inanimate object	Officer(s) Unidentified
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 30-34	Force: Handcuffs too tight	Officer(s) Unidentified
Johnson, Michael	Hispanic Male, 32	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Rosenberg, Michael	Hispanic Male, 32	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Smith, Gregory	Hispanic Male, 32	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Smith, Gregory	Hispanic Male, 32	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Hispanic Male, 30-34	Force: Physical force	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.