Complaint #201705278, June 2017

Incident: June 16, 2017
Received: June 28, 2017
Closed: January 25, 2018


Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 43rd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Isabel, George
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Garcia, Edwin
Complainant: Black Female, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Isabel, George
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Garcia, Edwin
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Isabel, George
Complainant: Black Female, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Garcia, Edwin
Complainant: Black Female, 38
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Isabel, George Hispanic Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Garcia, Edwin Black Female, 38 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Isabel, George Hispanic Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Garcia, Edwin Hispanic Male, 49 Abuse of Authority: Stop Exonerated
Isabel, George Black Female, 38 Abuse of Authority: Threat of summons Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Garcia, Edwin Black Female, 38 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated

Penalty

Isabel, George
Previously Adjudicated
Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)


Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.