Complaint #201707693, July 2017

Incident: July 27, 2017
Received: September 18, 2017
Closed: May 30, 2018

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 33rd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Officer:	Burns, Frank
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Burns, Frank
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Burns, Frank
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Burns, Frank
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Burns, Frank
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Greco, Brian
Complainant:	Hispanic Male, 43
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Greco, Brian
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Burns, Frank	Hispanic Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property	Unsubstantiated
Burns, Frank	Hispanic Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Burns, Frank	Hispanic Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unfounded
Burns, Frank		Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises	Exonerated
Burns, Frank	Hispanic Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device	Unsubstantiated
Greco, Brian	Hispanic Male, 43	Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number	Unsubstantiated
Greco, Brian		Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.