Complaint #201708558, October 2017

Incident: October 14, 2017
Closed: April 5, 2018

Documents:
Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary (Edwin Soto)

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - subway
Location: Subway station/train
In NYPD Midtown South Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Katie Miracco, Nikkia Prescod

Officer:	Soto, Edwin
Complainant:	White Male, 30
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	APU Not guilty
Officer:	Soto, Edwin
Complainant:	White Male, 30
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	APU Not guilty
Officer:	Soto, Edwin
Complainant:	White Male, 30
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	APU Not guilty
Officer:	Soto, Edwin
Complainant:	White Male, 30
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Disposition:	APU Guilty

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Soto, Edwin	White Male, 30	Force: Physical force	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Soto, Edwin	White Male, 30	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Soto, Edwin	White Male, 30	Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: APU Not guilty
Soto, Edwin	White Male, 30	Discourtesy: Word	Substantiated (Charges)
	NYPD Disposition: APU Guilty

Penalty

Soto, Edwin

CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 12 days

APU Trial Commissioner Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days

APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, May 2020

Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

Further details on conclusion definitions.