Complaint #201905037, June 2019

Incident: June 3, 2019
Received: June 10, 2019
Closed: August 18, 2020


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 106th Precinct Queens
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Steven Cruver
Officer: To, Kevin
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Burns, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Burns, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 22
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Burns, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Burns, Frank
Complainant: Black Male, 24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
To, Kevin Black Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Burns, Frank Black Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Burns, Frank Black Male, 22 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Burns, Frank Black Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Burns, Frank Black Male, 24 Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Unknown Officer Black Male, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Officer(s) Unidentified

Penalty

Burns, Frank
Retired


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.