Complaint #201906851, July 2019

Incident: July 22, 2019
Received: August 5, 2019
Closed: December 17, 2020


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Herman Kirton
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Onody, Patrick
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Onody, Patrick
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sharman, Samuel
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sharman, Samuel
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Marotta, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Onody, Patrick
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sharman, Samuel
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Dumasgalindo, Leticia
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Garcia, Derrick
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Sharman, Samuel
Complainant: Black Male, 14
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Onody, Patrick Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Onody, Patrick Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Sharman, Samuel Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Sharman, Samuel Black Male, 14 Force: Physical force Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Force: Handcuffs too tight Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Marotta, Christopher Black Male, 14 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Onody, Patrick Black Male, 14 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Sharman, Samuel Black Male, 14 Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Dumasgalindo, Leticia Black Male, 14 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Garcia, Derrick Black Male, 14 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unsubstantiated
Sharman, Samuel Black Male, 14 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Substantiated (Command Discipline A)

Penalties

Sharman, Samuel
DAO case
Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)

Marotta, Christopher
DAO case
Closed Administratively (No penalty reported)


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.