Complaint #202008449, December 2020

Incident: December 4, 2020
Received: December 28, 2020
Closed: June 2, 2022

Reason for contact: Execution of arrest/bench warrant
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 68th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Witness Officers: Greg Desideri, Christopher Diorio, Matthew Lockridge, Salvatore Mazzaro, Amir Pali, Benedetto Togati, Christopher Willoughby

Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Laveglia, Joshua
Complainant:	Male, 25-29
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unsubstantiated
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises	Exonerated
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises	Exonerated
Laveglia, Joshua	Male, 25-29	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.