Complaint #202102170, March 2021

Incident: March 23, 2021
Received: April 5, 2021
Closed: December 16, 2022


Documents:
Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary (Peter Litra)

Reason for contact: Other
Location: NYCHA
In NYPD 79th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Sukhvinder Tak
Officer: Thomas, Casey
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Thomas, Casey
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Litra, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Litra, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Litra, Peter
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Thomas, Casey Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Unsubstantiated
Thomas, Casey Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Unfounded
Litra, Peter Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Litra, Peter Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Unsubstantiated
Litra, Peter Black Female, 55-59 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Substantiated (Command Discipline B)

Penalty

Litra, Peter
Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU, June 2023
APU Closed: SOL Expired prior to APU


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.