Complaint #202300377, January 2023

Incident: January 12, 2023
Received: January 16, 2023
Closed: February 14, 2024

Reason for contact: Report of other crime
Location: Commercial building
In NYPD 52nd Precinct Bronx
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Santiago, Jared
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Marcus, Emily
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Santiago, Jared
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer:	Carroll, James
Complainant:	White Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion:	Within NYPD Guidelines

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unfounded
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Unfounded
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Property damaged	Unfounded
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Offensive Language: Other	Unfounded
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unfounded
Santiago, Jared	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card	Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest	Unfounded
Marcus, Emily	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Within NYPD Guidelines
Santiago, Jared	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Within NYPD Guidelines
Carroll, James	White Male, 35-39	Abuse of Authority: Stop	Within NYPD Guidelines

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.