Complaint #202302925,
April 6, 2023

Officer: Dozier, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Dozier, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Clemmings, Barrington
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Clemmings, Barrington
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Dozier, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Dozier, Christopher
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unfounded
Recategorized as: Offensive Language: Other
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Dozier, Christopher Black Male, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Dozier, Christopher Black Male, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unfounded
Clemmings, Barrington Black Male, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Clemmings, Barrington Black Male, 40-44 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Dozier, Christopher Black Male, 40-44 Discourtesy: Word Unable to Determine
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Dozier, Christopher Black Male, 40-44 Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Unfounded
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Recategorized as Offensive Language: Other on December 9, 2024

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusions.


Penalty

Clemmings, Barrington
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty

Details

Incident: April 6, 2023
Closed: August 19, 2024
Last Updated: December 11, 2024

Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 75th Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Moving violation summons issued

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected