Complaint #202506141,
June 1, 2025

Officer: Rodriguez, Erik
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Rodriguez, Erik
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Rodriguez, Erik
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Mejiacabral, Pilar
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Officer: Unknown Officer
Complainant: Male, 45-49
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Rodriguez, Erik
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Antonio, Brayan
Complainant: Male, 50-54
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Rodriguez, Erik Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Within NYPD Guidelines
Rodriguez, Erik Male, 50-54 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Rodriguez, Erik Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Unable to Determine
Mejiacabral, Pilar Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Unknown Officer Male, 45-49 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Rodriguez, Erik Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded
Antonio, Brayan Male, 50-54 Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Unable to Determine

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: June 1, 2025
Received: June 20, 2025
Closed: October 26, 2026

Reason for contact: C/V at PCT to obtain information
Location: Police building
In NYPD 32nd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Summons - disorderly conduct

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected
Video evidence collected