Complaint #202508004,
June 25, 2025

Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Paulik, Michael
Complainant: Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Officer: Peterford, Jesse
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
CCRB Board Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Conneely, Michael
Complainant: White Male, 30-34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Board Conclusion
Conneely, Michael White Male, 30-34 Force: Physical force Within NYPD Guidelines
Conneely, Michael Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Paulik, Michael Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Peterford, Jesse White Male, 30-34 Discourtesy: Action Unable to Determine
CCRB Investigator Recommendation: Substantiated
Conneely, Michael White Male, 30-34 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unable to Determine
Conneely, Michael White Male, 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Unable to Determine
Conneely, Michael White Male, 30-34 Offensive Language: Other Unable to Determine
Conneely, Michael White Male, 30-34 Discourtesy: Word Unable to Determine

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: June 25, 2025
Received: August 17, 2025
Closed: October 27, 2026

Reason for contact: CV already in custody
Location: Police building
In NYPD 61st Precinct Brooklyn
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime

Body-Worn Camera evidence collected
Video evidence collected