Complaint #9000283, January 1990

Incident: January 25, 1990
Received: January 26, 1990
Closed: January 26, 1990

Reason for contact: Stop/Question/Frisk
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Hourihan, Daniel
Allegation:	Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Riordan, Neil
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Hourihan, Daniel
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Hourihan, Daniel
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Riordan, Neil
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Riordan, Neil
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer:	Hourihan, Daniel
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Hourihan, Daniel	Force: Push/Shove	Exonerated
Riordan, Neil	Force: Gun pointed	Exonerated
Hourihan, Daniel	Force: Gun pointed	Exonerated
Hourihan, Daniel	Force: Other - Force	Unsubstantiated
Riordan, Neil	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unsubstantiated
Riordan, Neil	Discourtesy: Curse	Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Hourihan, Daniel	Discourtesy: Curse	Substantiated (Command Discipline)

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.