Complaint #9102069,
August 5, 1991

Officer: Burke, Robert
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perham, Christophe
Allegation: Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mccool, James
Allegation: Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Perham, Christophe
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mccool, James
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Perham, Christophe
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mccool, James
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Burke, Robert
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Perham, Christophe
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Mccool, James
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Burke, Robert
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Burke, Robert Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Perham, Christophe Force: Gun pointed Exonerated
Mccool, James Force: Gun pointed Exonerated
Perham, Christophe Force: Punch/Kick Unsubstantiated
Mccool, James Force: Punch/Kick Unsubstantiated
Perham, Christophe Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Exonerated
Mccool, James Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Exonerated
Burke, Robert Abuse of Authority: Person Searched Exonerated
Perham, Christophe Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Unsubstantiated
Mccool, James Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Unsubstantiated
Burke, Robert Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Details

Incident: August 5, 1991
Received: August 6, 1991
Closed: August 6, 1991

Reason for contact: Vehicle Stop and Check
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued