Complaint #9601518, March 1996

Incident: March 24, 1996
Received: April 4, 1996
Closed: April 4, 1996

Reason for contact: Stop/Question/Frisk
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Pipcinski, Bart
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Osullivan, Michael
Allegation:	Force: Gun pointed
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pipcinski, Bart
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Osullivan, Michael
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pipcinski, Bart
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Osullivan, Michael
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Pipcinski, Bart
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Osullivan, Michael
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Osullivan, Michael
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Pipcinski, Bart
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Pipcinski, Bart	Force: Gun pointed	Exonerated
Osullivan, Michael	Force: Gun pointed	Exonerated
Pipcinski, Bart	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, Michael	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Unsubstantiated
Pipcinski, Bart	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated
Osullivan, Michael	Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn	Exonerated
Pipcinski, Bart	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, Michael	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unsubstantiated
Osullivan, Michael	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated
Pipcinski, Bart	Discourtesy: Curse	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.