Complaint #9700852, March 1997

Incident: March 2, 1997
Received: March 10, 1997
Closed: March 10, 1997


Reason for contact: Dispute
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Stasinski, Kevin
Allegation: Force: Mace
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Glancy, James
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Stasinski, Kevin
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Williams, Charles
Allegation: Force: Punch/Kick
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Rosario, Diana
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Stasinski, Kevin
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Williams, Charles
Allegation: Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Officer: Rosario, Diana
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Stasinski, Kevin Force: Mace Exonerated
Glancy, James Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Stasinski, Kevin Force: Punch/Kick Exonerated
Williams, Charles Force: Punch/Kick Unsubstantiated
Rosario, Diana Force: Other - Force Exonerated
Stasinski, Kevin Force: Other - Force Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Williams, Charles Force: Other - Force Substantiated (Command Discipline)
Rosario, Diana Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.