Complaint #9804908, November 1998

Incident: November 12, 1998
Received: November 13, 1998
Closed: November 13, 1998


Reason for contact: Complainant at Pct. to make a Cmpl/info
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Glismann, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Mccarthy, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Fausak, Daniel
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Officer: Mccarthy, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Officer: Glismann, John
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Mccarthy, John
Allegation: Discourtesy: Profane Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Glismann, John Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp Substantiated (Charges)
Mccarthy, John Abuse of Authority: Threat of force Unfounded
Fausak, Daniel Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Exonerated
Mccarthy, John Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Substantiated (Charges)
Glismann, John Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse Unfounded
Mccarthy, John Discourtesy: Profane Gesture Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.