Complaint #9900560, February 1999

Incident: February 3, 1999
Received: February 5, 1999
Closed: February 5, 1999

Reason for contact: Stop/Question/Frisk
Outcome: Disorderly-Conduct/Arr/Summons

Officer:	Anderson, Eric
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Ortiz, Erick
Allegation:	Force: Other - Force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Anderson, Eric
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Ortiz, Erick
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Anderson, Eric
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Detention
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (Charges)
Officer:	Anderson, Eric
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Anderson, Eric
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Profane Gesture
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Anderson, Eric	Force: Other - Force	Unfounded
Ortiz, Erick	Force: Other - Force	Unfounded
Anderson, Eric	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Exonerated
Ortiz, Erick	Abuse of Authority: Person Searched	Exonerated
Anderson, Eric	Abuse of Authority: Detention	Substantiated (Charges)
Anderson, Eric	Abuse of Authority: Other - Abuse	Unsubstantiated
Anderson, Eric	Discourtesy: Profane Gesture	Unsubstantiated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.