Complaint #9900646, February 1999

Incident: February 9, 1999
Received: February 10, 1999
Closed: February 10, 1999

Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Olmo, Richard
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Force: Beat
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Kenny, Joseph
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Owens, Kevin
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Owens, Kevin
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded

Officer	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Kenny, Joseph	Force: Beat	Unfounded
Olmo, Richard	Discourtesy: Word	Unfounded
Kenny, Joseph	Force: Beat	Unfounded
Kenny, Joseph	Abuse of Authority: Vehicle searched	Exonerated
Kenny, Joseph	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Kenny, Joseph	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Kenny, Joseph	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Kenny, Joseph	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Kenny, Joseph	Offensive Language: Race	Unfounded
Owens, Kevin	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Owens, Kevin	Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)	Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.