Albert D. Germosen

Albert D. Germosen

Albert D. Germosen
Badge #2476, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at 123rd Precinct since March 2024, active
Also served at 76th Precinct
Service started July 2017, made $87,000 last year, Tax #964015

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25294
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case: 2022-25359
Closed: 6/16/2022

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
3 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202004250, June 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, April 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202004250, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Female, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, April 2023
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25294
Closed: 11/21/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully threatened to arrest an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25359
Closed: 6/16/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other


Lawsuits

Melendez, Miguel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 503735/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, February 17, 2022

Other Documents