Frank A. Bobick

Frank A. Bobick

Frank A. Bobick
Lieutenant at 110th Precinct since April 2024, active
Also served at 109th Precinct
Service started January 2012, made $119,000 last year, Tax #951550
White Male

Lawsuit settlements:
$30,000   Bostic, Jaiquan, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2016 EDNY EDNY 16CV03737
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
2 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202106440, October 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: American Indian Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202106592, August 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202106440, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises American Indian Female, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202106592, August 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Female, 40-44 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Bostic, Jaiquan, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV03737, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 23, 2016, ended July 17, 2018
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: The plaintiffs were enjoying a 4th of July barbecue, when defendant officers approached and began harassing plaintiffs. The officers began to arrest plaintiffs and without provocation, they beat plaintiffs repeatedly by punching them and using their batons. Plaintiffs were pepper sprayed, restrained and taken to the nearest precinct. The charges against the plaintiffs are unknown, but the criminal prosecution was terminated favorably regarding the plaintiffs.