Damian J. Weber

Badge #25697, White Male
Police Officer at 28th Precinct since October 2020, active
Service started January 2019, made $60,700 last year, Tax #967387

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26365
Closed: 12/1/2022
Case: 2022-25910
Closed: 10/12/2022

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
10 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202100465, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, March 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Complaint #202207593, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Female Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202100465, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Female, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Gun Pointed Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Female, 40-44 Unfounded
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial, March 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202003791, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Charges not served
APU Case Status: Closed: Charges not served, March 2023
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26365
Closed: 12/1/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful threat of force.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully used offensive language.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2022-25910
Closed: 10/12/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely activate body worn camera.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Other Documents