Alejandro Azcona

Badge #1704, Hispanic Male
Former Police Officer at 48th Precinct
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx
Service started January 2013, ended September 2022, Tax #953648

Complaints

3 Complaints
7 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200920, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201705986, July 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201406468, June 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202200920, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201705986, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 49 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Male, 49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201406468, June 2014
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Wallace, Timmy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV03414, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 15, 2022
Complaint

Wilson, Darnell vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 029552/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 28, 2021