Taha A. Jahmi

Taha A. Jahmi

Taha A. Jahmi
Badge #4791, White Male
Sergeant at 78th Precinct since October 2023, active
Service started January 2018, made $80,000 last year, Tax #964935

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Question

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28049
Closed: 1/2/2024
Case: 2022-27687
Closed: 1/27/2023

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$8,000   Forrest, Cody vs City of New York, et al., 2022 KCSC KCSC 522256/2022
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
2 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202200621, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202104257, July 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: American Indian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: American Indian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201910998, December 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201809158, October 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Male, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202200621, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202104257, July 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search American Indian Male, 25-29 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card American Indian Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201910998, December 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 47 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201809158, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Male, 39 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28049
Closed: 1/2/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully questioned an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2022-27687
Closed: 1/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 7 known lawsuits, $8,000 total settlements.

Corrica, Sean vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 534764/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, December 5, 2023

Bain, Romaine vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 528391/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, October 3, 2023

Clarke, Dexroy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 535188/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, December 8, 2022

Watson, Camar vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 532563/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, November 10, 2022

Forrest, Cody vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 522256/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 27, 2022, ended March 9, 2023
$8,000 Settlement

Basley, Adonis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 525936/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 8, 2022

Rivera, Jermaine vs P.O. Jahmi, Taha, et al.
Case # 22CV02233, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 19, 2022

Other Documents