Carlos A. Chacon

Carlos A. Chacon

Carlos A. Chacon
Badge #20662, Hispanic Male
Also served at 114th Precinct
Service started January 2005, made $125,000 last year, Tax #936330


Complaints

3 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201802254, January 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201704187, May 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200608463, June 2006
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Asian Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Asian Male, 48
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201802254, January 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201704187, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male, 25 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200608463, June 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Asian Male, 48 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 48 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Asian Male, 48 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-15
Opened: 3/29/2010
Closed: 3/31/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While off duty having been involved in an unusual police occurrence, said member failed to notify the operations unit.
  2. Guilty: While off duty failed to carry said member's New York Police Department identification card while out of state.
  3. Guilty: While off duty having been involved in an unusual police occurrence, failed to provide a truthful response to an out of state supervising officer in that said member denied being a member of the New York City Police Department.
  4. Guilty: While off duty wrongfully requested an out of state officer responding to an unusual police incident to "look the other way."
  5. Guilty: While off duty was discourteous to out of state members of service.
Penalty: Vacation days (45 days)