Justin A. Ruiz

Justin A. Ruiz

Justin A. Ruiz
Badge #4809, Hispanic Male
Detective Specialist at 62nd Precinct since May 2018
Service started April 2017, made $172,000 last year, Tax #963730

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29840
Closed: 6/5/2024

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$1,500   Palma, Nina vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 EDNY EDNY 21CV06872
View Details

Complaints

10 Complaints
34 Allegations
4 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Unavailable
5 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
2 OMB PEG Directive Closure
5 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
9 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202512770, November 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202406641, June 2024
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202406035, June 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Detention
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Detention
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: South Asian Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details

Complaint #202402219, March 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202401308, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202401149, January 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202205683, August 2022
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202202662, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202101090, February 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201906513, July 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202512770, November 2025
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202406641, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Physical force Male, 30-34 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202406035, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number South Asian Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk South Asian Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card South Asian Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) South Asian Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Detention Black Male Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Detention South Asian Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain Black Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain South Asian Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word South Asian Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male Within NYPD Guidelines
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details
Complaint #202402219, March 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Female, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Female, 30-34 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202401308, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 30-34 OMB PEG Directive Closure
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Male, 30-34 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202401149, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 45-49 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202205683, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202202662, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 40-44 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202101090, February 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises White Male, 50-54 Complainant Uncooperative
Abuse of Authority: Gun Drawn White Male, 50-54 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force White Male, 50-54 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Hit against inanimate object White Male, 50-54 Complainant Uncooperative
Force: Physical force White Male, 50-54 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201906513, July 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Female, 35 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29840
Closed: 6/5/2024
Case Details:
  1. Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Palma, Nina vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV06872, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 13, 2021, ended September 14, 2023
$1,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 9, 2020, at about 4:30 p.m., Plaintiff was lawfully present inside her residence at 128 Lake Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11223. At said time and place, Defendant NYPD Police Officers JOHN and JANE DOE 1 through 10 responded to an incident at same. Plaintiff was not in any way involved in the incident to which said Defendants were responding. The defendant officers did not question or otherwise interact with Plaintiff regarding said incident. The defendant officers entered Plaintiff’s residence through the front door. At the time, Plaintiff was seated in a chair in the same room where said Defendants entered (i.e., the room with the front door). Without cause or reason, the defendant officers, told Pl...

Other Documents