Charles Cadiz

Badge #3827, Hispanic Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Detective Borough SID
Also served at 49th Precinct
Service started July 2005, ended October 2022, Tax #938145

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2010-1563
Closed: 1/5/2011

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201113788, October 2011
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 58
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201017547, December 2010
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Female, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200811205, August 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 58
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201113788, October 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Substantiated (Charges)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 58 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201017547, December 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Black Female, 14 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200811205, August 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 58 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-1563
Closed: 1/5/2011
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully issued a summons to an individual known to the Department who did not provide identification and was undomiciled.
  2. Guilty: Failed to request a Patrol Supervisor to the scene of a police incident.
  3. Guilty: Failed to obtain permission from Patrol Supervisor to transport an arrestee to an address where arrestee claimed to reside.
  4. Guilty: Failed to notify radio dispatch when placing arrestee in a patrol car and subsequently released arrestee on the street.
  5. Guilty: Failed to make proper activity logs.
  6. Guilty: Failed to conduct a warrant check pursuant to issuing a criminal court summons.
Penalty: Vacation days (15 days)