Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2010-1562
Closed: 6/21/2010
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
-
Guilty:
While off duty said officer consumed an intoxicant to the extent that he was unfit for duty.
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant.
-
Guilty:
While off duty wrongfully operated a motor vehicle while his ability was impaired by the consumption of alcohol.
-
Guilty:
Wrongfully possessed two duplicate New York City Police Department shields without authority.
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, pre-trial suspension days (32 days), vacation days (3 days)
Davis, Pamela vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159616/2017,
Supreme Court - New York, November 9, 2017, ended February 12, 2019
$3,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 25, 2016, at approximately 2:00 p.m., Pamela Davis was walking near 112th and 113th Streets and First Avenue in Manhattan when NYPD Officer Joseph King approached her. Officer King grabbed Ms. Davis’s arm, ordered her to stop, and reached into her bag without her consent. He took her identification, returned to his patrol van, and after some time issued her a summons for disorderly conduct. Ms. Davis was required to appear in court twice before the summons was dismissed on January 5, 2017. She alleges false arrest, malicious prosecution, and emotional harm as a result of the officer’s actions.