Ibn R. Barthelemy

Badge #21937, Black Male
Police Officer at 48th Precinct since February 2018, active
Service started January 2017, made $147,000 last year, Tax #962940

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (2)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Complaints

3 Complaints
13 Allegations
7 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
4 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300366, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202206493, September 2022
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202203713, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202300366, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Female, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 40-44 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202206493, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202203713, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Hispanic Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.