Tyesha C. Mccloud

Tyesha C. Mccloud

Tyesha C. Mccloud
Badge #1949, Black Female
Sergeant at 25th Precinct since August 2026
Service started January 2017, made $175,000 last year, Tax #963150

Complaints

3 Complaints
3 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 SRAD Closure
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202505326, June 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202300796, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202002313, March 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202505326, June 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Male, 60-64 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202300796, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202002313, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 50-54 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Bautista, Danilo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 156883/2023, Supreme Court - New York, July 17, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about August 20, 2022 plaintiff was detained by the defendants and falsely accused of intent to cause physical injury to another person by means of a dangerous weapon. He was falsely accused of the aforesaid criminal act or acts after acting in self-defense after being brutally attacked by a perpetrator who punched and kicked and/or stumped his body. He was arrested by defendants and placed into a cell and imprisoned for the course of 2 days and was formally arraigned and processed on August 21, 2022. This arrest has caused the plaintiff to be hospitalized after a rise in blood pressure and anxiety caused by the unlawful detention. The defendants took his high school ring (worth ca. $2,000), but did not...