Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $9,500 total settlements.
Brewster, Tarsha as M/n/g of N., J. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 718232/2025,
Supreme Court - Queens, June 26, 2025
Mayers, Tariq vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 714813/2023,
Supreme Court - Queens, August 1, 2023
Complaint
Description: On or about October 2, 2022, plaintiff was traveling in a car that was stopped by the defendants, who removed plaintiff and handcuffed and arrested him. They transferred him to a precinct, where he was subjected to a strip search and confined to a cell with other prisoners for several hours. Thereafter, he was transported to Queens County Criminal Court, where he was again confined to a cell with other prisoners. On October 3, 2022, plaintiff was arraigned, charging him with Making a Terroristic Threat. Later the matter was dismissed.
Antonetti, Carlos A. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 20CV05109,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 18, 2022, ended January 11, 2024
$9,500 Settlement
Complaint