Rafael B. Pimentel

Rafael B. Pimentel

Rafael B. Pimentel
Badge #1369, Hispanic Male
Sergeant Special Assignment at Bronx Court Section since June 2026
Also served at Narcotics Borough Bronx, Police Service Area 7
Service started July 2011, made $188,000 last year, Tax #951060

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card (4)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk (3)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Stop (2)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30313
Closed: 5/28/2024

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$12,500   Rivera, Angel vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 803001/2021E
$20,000   Martinez, Anderson vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 031422/2020E
$20,000   Ortiz, Gary vs City of New York, 2020 BCSC BCSC 035339/2019E
$32,500   Wright, Melvin vs City of New York, et al., 2013 BCSC BCSC 307211/2013
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
15 Allegations
13 Substantiated
13 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202308493, August 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202305059, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 27, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202303687, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202208462, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 30, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202308493, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202305059, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Age 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 21-24 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Formalized Training
APU Plea Penalty: Formalized Training
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 27, 2026
Penalty: Formalized Training
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202303687, April 2023
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202208462, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Hispanic, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, with discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, with discipline, May 30, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30313
Closed: 5/28/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to timely make proper notifications.
  2. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
  3. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
  4. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 4 known lawsuits, $85,000 total settlements.

Rivera, Angel vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 803001/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 4, 2021, ended September 2, 2021
$12,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 2, 2017 on a Bronx crossstreet at around 2:30 p.m. plaintiff was stopped by officers. Plaintiff was accosted, searched, and placed under arrest. Plaintiff was placed in a police vehicle and driven several blocks and then transfered into a different NYPD vehicle. Plaintiff was taken to a police precinct and charged for criminal sale of a controlled substance and criminal possession of a controlled substance even though no items were recovered during search. Plaintiff spent 2 days in custody and released following arraingment. After 2 years and 13 court appearances, charges were dropped.

Martinez, Anderson vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 031422/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 6, 2020, ended June 8, 2023
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 18, 2017, Anderson Martinez was stopped by NYPD Detectives Rafael Pimentel, Matthew Lombardo, Leva Gevargiz, Terrence Blumenberg, and other unidentified officers near 11 West Fordham Road in the Bronx. Officers allegedly tackled Mr. Martinez to the ground without cause, drove their knees into his back, and searched him in full view of bystanders. Mr. Martinez was falsely accused of drug-related offenses and detained for three days before charges were dismissed. He alleges that he was targeted due to his Hispanic ethnicity, suffered physical and emotional injuries, and was maliciously prosecuted, with officers allegedly fabricating evidence to justify the arrest.

Ortiz, Gary vs City of New York
Case # 035339/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 8, 2020, ended May 11, 2023
$20,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 3, 2018, plaintiff was inside a Food Dynasty Supermarket when defendant officers Rafael Pimentel and John/Jane Doe 1-10 illegally stopped and searched the plaintiff without an arrest warrant. Although the defendants found no contraband on the plaintiff, they falsely claimed that they found a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia in order to justify the otherwise invalid arrest. The plaintiff sustained multiple assaults and batteries during said arrest, including by officer Pimentel. Plaintiff was falsely arrested and had an unfounded criminal investigation proceeded against him by the defendants based on personal retribution that Pimentel sought due to a prior successful lawsuit against him by...

Wright, Melvin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 307211/2013, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 13, 2013, ended May 22, 2015
$32,500 Settlement

Other Documents