Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits.
Lundi, Widson and Noisette, Jordan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 155721/2026,
Supreme Court - New York, May 12, 2026
Samuel, Jessica vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 711734/2026,
Supreme Court - Queens, April 24, 2026
Manning, Christopher & Caballero, Mario vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802857/2026E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 17, 2026
Larrea, Joni vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 715045/2024,
Supreme Court - Queens, July 23, 2024
Complaint
Description: On October 9, 2022, Plaintiff was a passenger in a car in Astoria, Queens, NY. Plaintiffs brother was driving while Plaintiff sat in the front passenger seat. A police car signaled for the car to stop. Plaintiff’s brother pulled the car over. Two officers approached the vehicle, one at the passenger side, the other at the driver’s side. Defendants commanded Plaintiff and his brother to roll down the front windows. They complied. Officers opened the driver’s side door, pulled Plaintiff’s brother out of the seat, and handcuffed Plaintiff’s brother. Plaintiff recorded the arrest using his cell phone and exited the car to continue to record the incident. An officer swung his fist at Plaintiff and knocked the phone ...