Dwayne S. Francis

Badge #1851, Black Male
Former Detective Specialist at 63rd Precinct
Service started July 2003, ended June 2023, Tax #932660

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2014-11790
Closed: 5/27/2014

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$7,500   Papiashvili, James vs City of New York, et al., 2013 SDNY SDNY 13CV03411
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201204518, April 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200803274, February 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 51
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200604710, April 2006
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200409102, September 2004
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201204518, April 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 20 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200803274, February 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 51 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 51 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200604710, April 2006
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200409102, September 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Other Male, 23 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Male, 23 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2014-11790
Closed: 5/27/2014
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, did fail to make complete and accurate entries in his memo book.
  2. Guilty: While on-duty, did wrongfully and without just cause prevent or interfere with an official Department investigation.
  3. Guilty: While on-duty, did wrongfully cause false entries to be made in Department records.
  4. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully questioned an individual in police custody prior to reading the required miranda warnings to said individual.
Penalty: Dismissal probation (12 months), vacation days (45 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $7,500 total settlements.

Perez, Miguel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 507478/2013, Supreme Court - Kings, February 7, 2014

Papiashvili, James vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV03411, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, May 21, 2013, ended April 7, 2014
$7,500 Settlement
Complaint

Other Documents