Jonathan J. Lipke

Former Lieutenant at Highway Unit 02
Also served at 109th Precinct
Service started August 1993, ended February 2022, Tax #904374
Asian Male

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2017-17977
Closed: 6/19/2018

View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200411009, October 2004
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9701364, April 1997
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #9402744, August 1994
Allegation: Force: Push/Shove
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Curse
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200411009, October 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Hispanic Male, 22 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9701364, April 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9402744, August 1994
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Push/Shove Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Sh Refuse Cmp Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Curse Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2017-17977
Closed: 6/19/2018
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Said Lieutenant improperly and repeatedly used his Department computer to access internet websites unrelated to his Department duties during his regular and overtime tours and also while off-duty
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully conducted personal business during his scheduled tour
  3. Guilty: Used Department vehicle, for a non-Department purpose or non-city purpose.
  4. Guilty: On multiple occasions, used Department smartphone, for a non-Department purpose or non-city purpose.
  5. Guilty: Failed to carry out his duties as the integrity control officer by being absent from his assignment
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Mclennon, Winston, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV06320, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, November 5, 2014
Settlement
Complaint, Amended Complaint
Description: Legal Aid's Case against unlawful highway stops in Queens

Khazin v. The City of New York et al
Case # 17CV03779, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
Complaint
Description: Sgt. Valentin Khazin's claims that he was targeted with unjustified payback from higher ups because he wouldn't help make life miserable for another Police Officer Dana Harge who had filed a lawsuit alleging racial discrimination.

Harge v. City Of New York et al
Case # 16CV05160, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff, an officer in Highway Unit 3, is suing over racial discrimination within the unit by his supervisors.