Darin Lazar

Darin Lazar

Darin Lazar
Badge #3577, White Male, 40
Sergeant at Midtown South Precinct since September 2017, active
Also served at 9th Precinct
Service started January 2007, made $175,000 last year, Tax #943470

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2015-13271
Closed: 5/24/2016
Case: 2015-14318
Closed: 4/12/2016

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$75,000   Demunn, Trenton vs City of New York, et al., 2022 NYCSC NYCSC 159878/2022
$25,000   Law, Stephen vs City of New York, et al., 2015 SDNY SDNY 14CV09382
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
2 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded

Complaint #202302239, October 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #201903983, April 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201500002, December 2014
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 9 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 2017
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 9 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201308728, September 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201110248, August 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200816949, November 2008
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 47
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202302239, October 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched Black Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Black Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #201903983, April 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Male, 33 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201500002, December 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 31 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 9 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, March 2017
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 9 days
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201308728, September 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 35 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201110248, August 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 26 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200816949, November 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 47 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2015-13271
Closed: 5/24/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully made inaccurate or misleading statements which caused inaccurate entries to be made in a Department record
Penalty: Vacation days (12 days)

Case: 2015-14318
Closed: 4/12/2016
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: While on-duty, wrongfully used force by pushing a person known to the Department without police necessity.
Penalty: Vacation days (9 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $100,000 total settlements.

Demunn, Trenton vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159878/2022, Supreme Court - New York, November 21, 2022, ended April 10, 2023
$75,000 Settlement

Law, Stephen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV09382, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 19, 2015, ended October 28, 2015
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 14, 2013, plaintiff Stephen Law was walking with his girlfriend on a public sidewalk when, for no legitimate reason, Officer Darin Lazar (in the company of other unidentified police officers) grabbed Mr. Law by the wrist and attempted to jerk him backwards and around. When Mr. Law demanded an explanation and to be released, Officer Lazar twisted Mr. Law's arms behind his back, scooped his legs out from under him, and threw him on to the pavement. The officers then jammed their knees into Mr. Law's back, pushing his face and body into the concrete and causing him to bleed from his face. The officers then handcuffed Mr. Law, deliberately too tightly, such that he could not feel his fingertips. Th...

Other Documents