Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $100,000 total settlements.
Demunn, Trenton vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159878/2022,
Supreme Court - New York, November 21, 2022, ended April 10, 2023
$75,000 Settlement
Law, Stephen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV09382,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 19, 2015, ended October 28, 2015
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 14, 2013, plaintiff Stephen Law was walking with his girlfriend on a public sidewalk when, for no legitimate reason, Officer Darin Lazar (in the company of other unidentified police officers) grabbed Mr. Law by the wrist and attempted to jerk him backwards and around. When Mr. Law demanded an explanation and to be released, Officer Lazar twisted Mr. Law's arms behind his back, scooped his legs out from under him, and threw him on to the pavement. The officers then jammed their knees into Mr. Law's back, pushing his face and body into the concrete and causing him to bleed from his face. The officers then handcuffed Mr. Law, deliberately too tightly, such that he could not feel his fingertips. Th...