Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Dubinsky, Leonid vs City of New York et al.
Case # 523764/2018,
Supreme Court - Kings, December 27, 2018
Complaint
Description: On November 28, 2015, Plaintiff was lawfully inside his Brooklyn apartment when NYPD officers unlawfully entered, forcibly threw him to the ground, and handcuffed him, causing injuries, including a laceration and bruised ribs, despite him posing no threat or resistance. Plaintiff was detained and transported to the 60th Precinct, where EMS provided initial treatment before taking him to Coney Island Hospital for further care. He was subsequently taken to Central Booking and, due to ongoing pain, transferred to Lutheran Hospital for additional medical attention. Plaintiff was arraigned in Brooklyn Criminal Court on November 30, 2015.