Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 6 known lawsuits, $2,143,000 total settlements.
Hooper, Robert vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV06311,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 27, 2024, ended April 11, 2025
$2,100,000 Settlement
Grant, Thomas vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV01376,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 18, 2021, ended April 6, 2023
$13,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 17, 2019, the Defendants, unlawfully stopped, questioned, searched, arrested, and detained the Plaintiff. The plaintiff was detained for over 72 hours. Subsequently, the DA refused to prosecute Plaintiff resulting
in the determination of the criminal proceedings in favor of the Plaintiff.
Vargas, Robert vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV03658,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 27, 2018, ended October 21, 2019
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 28, 2017, plaintiff Robert Vargas left an apartment building when defendant police officers wearing plain clothes seized upon the plaintiff and began violently beating him and dragged him down to the ground where they continued their attack which also included using a police radio to hit the plaintiff. The defendants expressed that plaintiff should have worked with them when he had the chance, which was in reference to his refusal earlier that year to work as an informant for the NYPD Narcotics Bureau.
Despite the plaintiff suffering serious and visible injuries and having trouble breathing, the defendants failed to secure the necessary medical care and instead arrested plaintiff and brought him to the ...
Howard, Douglas vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 113452/2010,
Supreme Court - New York, October 22, 2010, ended February 15, 2016
Zero Disposition
Espinal, Adrian Lora vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 150090/2010,
Supreme Court - New York, May 12, 2010, ended February 6, 2023
Zero Disposition
Howard, Douglas vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 310241/2009,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 5, 2010, ended May 9, 2017
Administrative Closing