Carlos A. Pappagallo

Badge #5121, White Male
Sergeant at Criminal Intelligence Section since March 2023, active
Also served at 24th Precinct
Service started January 2012, made $134,000 last year, Tax #952090
carlos.pappagallo@nypd.org

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300796, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #202201364, February 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202300796, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #202201364, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Chokehold Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Restricted Breathing Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.